India’s foreign policy vis-a-vis European & non-European intellectual traditions

By Sudhanshu Tripathi

Indeed, India’s foreign policy occupies a distinguished place in international relations due to its persistent commitment and adherence towards eternal and universal moral values. That reflects its overall peace-loving and humanitarian outlook which largely underscores the salient characteristics of both Western & Non-Western Intellectual Traditions. In fact, the Western or Eurocentric intellectual tradition largely lays stress over actual human endeavour in this world for securing all round worldly pleasures and material gains. It is so particularly because most of the people in modern age consider themselves as the products of Enlightenment.

And that prompts them to believe that human life can be improved through struggle and hard work under direction of worldly physical forces and verifiable knowledge, commonly promoting materialism or inclination towards material pleasures. As obvious, this rationalisation underscores the utmost necessity of earnest efforts for securing one’s overall progress and prosperity. But this rational approach does not provide a reasonable and due space for taking into account few non-empirical or unverifiable facts like spiritual or metaphysical aspects and extra-mental consciousness.

Because these are supposed to influence outward rationalist commitments of an individual to a reasonable extent as common perception goes and psychologists firmly believe. But this rationalist participation leading to excessive materialism, secularism, atomism and mechanisation of socio-cultural life during preceding decades have resulted into a kind of cultural and religious privatisation. That has unfortunately marred their homely feelings of closeness and generosity with each other or unity, fraternity, group identity, solidarity and social harmony, selflessness, contributions towards society and even supreme sacrifice unto the state.

In fact, the nurturing, protection and promotion of the cultural identity do assume common cultural traits of Western or Euro-centric intellectual traditions and they act as foundation upon which the European nations and states have evolved since ages and continue to do so, despite being offshoots of the state action in any way whatsoever. Whereas non-Western or non-Eurocentric intellectual traditions including that of Tibetan, Japanese, Chinese, Manchurian, Korean, IndianAfricanIslamicJewishLatin American, native American etc. though acknowledge rationalist commitments to work in this temporal world for progress and prosperity yet they fail to remain aloof from the reflectivist manifestations of many unanswered realities so far as they do converge over the fact of non-empirical accounts with respect to some of the fundamental truths in search of exploring the actual cause of a  worldly phenomenon in this mundane world.

As a matter of fact, the ideological clashes between liberal-democratic and autocratic-authoritarian intellectual traditions are centuries-old to trace their origin. Indeed, they may be found to lie deep into the struggle for establishing freedom and democracy for the common masses against the prevailing powerful monarchical political systems, especially during closing decades of the middle century and arrival of modern age in Europe. This clash for securing the liberal-democratic political order was accompanied by emancipation of common masses from the centuries-old custom of slavery.

In fact, those were the days when kings derived their origin into divinity as being incarnation of God on earth. Such divine authority was obviously beyond question from popular criticisms as they had to just obey the commands of the king in all sincerity having blind faith even that might have been harmful to them. Similarly, the social, economic and religious systems also sought complete subordination of common masses during those days in Europe. While social hierarchies marked bitter inequalities among different sections of society, economic guilds virtually enslaved all the working classes and so did all powerful Church. Because the Church virtually ruled over them with full might during earlier centuries of the middle ages.

Thus common populace was the worst sufferer as they had to suffer all kinds of humiliation, loot, plunder or even brutal killings at the hands of nobles, knights, lords, and other higher echelons of the ruling classes, elites and upper-class citizenry, including the church authorities, like popes and other church fathers. Obviously the sole concern of these hapless lots was to come out of the yoke of the inhuman slavery, despotism and all other kinds of exploitation, oppressions and suppression that had turned them as a wretched lot – or the proletariat in Marxist terminology – in the then European society. In fact, the background history of the French Revolution in 18th century truly depicts these glaring inequalities and evils prevailing therein and almost the same condition prevailed in most parts of the Anglo-European societies during those days.

As the European societies had undergone twice through the course of renaissance and reformation – first in 13th AD century in Italy and the second in 17th AD century in Britain – causing rapid growth of science and technology and leading to massive industrialisation and large-scale production of common man’s commodities, that indeed engendered socio-economic progress and prosperity and also rising individual and social awareness towards one’s self, society and also state. This further led to arouse nationalism and solemn subservience and duty towards the state demanding liberty, equality, fraternity and also participation in the entire state affairs of governance.

While the rising popular demands for all welfare services turned the state as a welfare organisation, the emerging logic of capitalism propelled the European states to go in search of raw materials and markets to sell their finished products as their markets were already gluttoned with huge production of commodities. Hence, this expanding capitalism resulted into onset of colonialism when the European trading companies like Dutch, Portugese, French and East India Company of Britain, virtually took over the entire political and administrative control of their host countries, spreading over in the larger continents of Asia, Africa and Latin America, altogether characterised as the Third World or underdeveloped or developing countries.

These countries were very rich in terms of natural resources and also had dense population, offering a large market and that served the very reason for advancing capitalism behind the consequent veil of the imperialism in all over the Anglo-European world. In fact, this reason of securing economic interests of the Anglo-European world at the cost of the economic ruin of the Third World resulted into violence and various other forms of exploitation altogether constituting the very logic for the dominant western industrialised nations’ supremacy and hegemony over the Third World.

All these developments have had their adverse yet indelible impacts upon India’s evolving socio-political psyche and such cultural ethos which altogether is strictly committed to Truth, Peace, Justice, Non-violence etc., and never accepted injustice and oppression & suppression of the weaker-sections, either in national or international society. Hence they put bold imprints upon the independent India’s foreign policy which reflected into its foundational principles as peace & cooperation, non-violence, non-alignment, etc.. But behind the garb of all these noble ideals, there was the deep-seated desire for strategic autonomy in decision-making in international politics and relations. That the country has always longed-for even prior to independence due to having continental size and huge population with abundance of flora and fauna and natural resources, super-scribed by the rich ancient cultural tradition and so-evolving universal-cosmopolitan heritage.

Thus ideological contradictions as manifested in different social, political and  economic dimensions due to diversities in ideologies continue to drive deep wedge between them thereby influencing their national foreign policies. And India, like many other countries in the world, is no exception as it had to gear up its foreign policy to play its desired role in international relations as well as global affairs to protect its national interests while maintaining its strategic autonomy and commitment towards eternal-universal ideals and moral values. Indeed these unparalleled cultural traits in the Indian culture characterised by peace, love, compassion, benevolence, non-violence, tolerance, humanism and cosmic vision are the rarest attributes mostly unavailable in other cultures of the world.

In fact, they emphasize internal as well external balance of the self and also harmony with a sense of belongingness with all living or non-living entities and also among themselves. In fact, India’s foreign policy still upholds all these noble ideas into practice while interacting with other states in the world and that creates a kind of hypocrisy and also confusion among leaders and policy makers who adhere to realism and discard soft policies with respect to international politics and relations and global affairs as well.

Prof. Sudhanshu Tripathi, U.P. Rajarshi Tandon Open University, Prayagaraj (UP)

Show More

Foreign Policy News

Foreign Policy News is a self-financed initiative providing a venue and forum for political analysts and experts to disseminate analysis of major political and business-related events in the world, shed light on particulars of U.S. foreign policy from the perspective of foreign media and present alternative overview on current events affecting the international relations.

Related Articles

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker